logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.10.11 2018나53808
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

On April 23, 2013, the Plaintiff, a corporation running non-life insurance business, concluded an automobile insurance contract with the limited liability company, the owner of AK7 Passenger Vehicles (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) and the insured limited liability company with respect to the instant vehicle from April 23, 2013 to April 23, 2014.

B around 05:45 on May 24, 2013, around 05:05, 05: (a) drive the instant vehicle with C on the rear seat of the instant vehicle, and (b) drive the said vehicle on the two-lane road of the national road No. 14, which is a two-lane road, in accordance with the first lane of the national highway No. 14, which is a macropopic road, and was driven on the macropopic dive surface from the macropop

그곳에서는 ‘국도14호선 성내지구 입체횡단시설 설치공사’가 진행되고 있었으므로 이를 우회하는 도로가 임시로 설치되어 있었는데, B는 위 임시 도로의 급커브 구간에서 도로 좌측 연석을 충격하고 반대쪽으로 튕기면서 도로 우측 임시 방벽을 충격하였다

(hereinafter “the instant accident”). The instant vehicle was transferred to another person due to the instant accident, and B suffered injury, such as cage cages at the left 5, 6, 7, and 8, such as cage cages at the left fages, cages at crym 3, and crym crym crym cryms, and the instant vehicle was destroyed and disposed

The Plaintiff paid 96,188,090 won for damages to C (i.e., 85,000,000 won for the agreed amount of KRW 11,188,090 for the instant vehicle). The Plaintiff paid 12,550,000 for the damages to the instant vehicle.

The Defendant is the construction and manager of the road at the location where the instant accident occurred.

【In the absence of dispute, the road where the accident in this case occurred due to the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the cause of claim as to the descriptions and images of Gap’s Nos. 1 through 3, 5 through 8, 10 (including the number of pages), Eul’s Nos. 5 and 7, and the cause of claim as a whole, is a continuous section of the bend and the bend section due to a change in the shape of the line due to a change in the shape of a road extension work between macro-Decrees. The 68.

arrow