(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.08.14 2014구합1237

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.08.14 2014구합1237

일반분양이주택지결정무효확인

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The defendant's project implementation and relocation measures clause 1) The Gyeongnam-do Governor (hereinafter "the project of this case") announced on August 19, 199 as Cro-Road Construction Project B publicly announced on August 19, 199.

2) In order to establish and implement relocation measures for those who have lost their base of living as part of the instant project zone, the Defendant prepared the Rules on Assistance to Residents in Changwon-si (amended by Directive No. 70 of July 14, 1997; hereinafter referred to as the “instant Support Rules”), and prepared detailed guidelines for sale of the migrant Housing Site (hereinafter referred to as the “Detailed Guidelines”) in order to present the guidelines for the disposal of the housing site for resettlement.

3) According to the instant provision and detailed guidelines, in the case of a resident prior to the date of the notification of the approval for the implementation plan of the relevant district as a building prior to April 1, 1974, among the persons subject to relocation, the possession of one parcel per household is the person subject to parcelling-out, and in the case of a resident prior to the date of the approval for the implementation plan of the relevant district as a building prior to January 24, 1989, one parcel per household is the person subject to general preferential priority who sells one parcel of land for each household to the general public at the selling price. According to the plan for the implementation of the relocation plan of the relocation district of the relocation district of the relevant district (D village in which the plaintiff resided) around May 15, 1998, the person subject to the purchase price in the application of the relocation site should be the development cost and the person subject to the actual user shall be the one subject to the appraisal price. (b) The Plaintiff shall be subject to the removal of the housing site of the 1983 square meters of the instant land.

The location of the building of this case is the above E-ro and the Plaintiff’s pre-compensation from the Defendant.

유사 판례

-창원지방법원 2012. 9. 13. 선고 2012구합681 판결

-부산고등법원(창원) 2015.04.30 2014나22362

-부산고등법원(창원) 2015.05.14 2014나21949

-창원지방법원 2017.04.25 2016구합948

-창원지방법원 2014.12.19 2014구합562