Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding seven million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 01:20 on April 6, 2014, the Defendant: (a) performed the duty of arresting a person suspected of having been on duty of committing an act of committing an act of committing a flagrant offense against the death or death or death of a taxi in Ulsan-gu Police Station C district located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; (b) on the police officer D belonging to the said district, who was carrying out the duty of arresting the person suspected of having been on duty of committing an act of committing an act of committing an act of committing a flagrant offense; (c) the police officer who was carrying out the duty of committing an act of committing an act of committing an act of committing an act of committing an act of committing an act of committing a crime of committing an act of committing a crime of committing a death or death of a taxi in the same district; (d) the Defendant d by d

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the crime control of police officer D and security guards E.

2. In the presence of civil petitioners who visited the said district for the purpose of investigation, etc. at the time, place, etc. mentioned in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim F (the 27 years of age) by “Y YE ZE ZE ZE ZE ZE ZE ZE ZE ZE ZE ZE ZE ZE ZE ZE ZE ZE ZE ZE

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement by the police of the F and E;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is under the influence of Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order, and thus, it is not good for female police officers to interfere with their official duties, such as ushesheshesheshes insulting speech.

Provided, That the punishment shall be determined as per the disposition in consideration of the fact that the person has not been punished three times due to drinking driving, etc. and has no previous record of the same kind, and his/her mistake is against depth.