logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.08.23 2018나2027339
하자보수보증금 등
Text

1. The defendant B and C among the judgment of the court of first instance, including the claim extended at the trial.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment on this part of the underlying facts is as follows: “The portion added to A. added to the portion below below below below below below below below below below below below 13; “C was declared bankrupt on August 12, 2016 by Seoul Central District Court 2016Hahap103; and D (Defendant Administrator) was appointed as the bankruptcy trustee on August 12, 2016 during the proceeding of the lawsuit in this case; and D (Defendant Administrator) was appointed as the bankrupt trustee after being declared bankrupt by the Seoul Central District Court on August 12, 2016 (2016Hau103); the Plaintiff transferred the lawsuit for damages to the lawsuit for the confirmation of bankruptcy claim; the Plaintiff changed the portion of 5th sentence “5th sentence” to “5th sentence,” and each of subparagraphs 1 through 5th sentence “No. 5th sentence” to “No. 18th sentence of the Civil Procedure Act” to “No. 1st sentence 5th sentence.

As of April 26, 2012, Defendant B, C, F, and Defendant E entered into an agreement with each other to subcontract some of the construction works to Defendant E after checking the contract amount, the amount of the construction contract amount, the amount claimed, the amount of the completed price, the amount received, the amount of the completed price, the amount of the remainder of the construction work as of April 26, 2012 for the successful implementation of the instant apartment construction project after suspending the construction work. Defendant E entered into a contract with Defendant E to supply sewage for the remaining construction works, balcony expansion works, and underground reinforcement works among the instant apartment construction works pursuant to the above agreement.

''

B. The list of specific assignment households with 537 households among the 803 households of the apartment of this case is annexed to attached Form 3.

arrow