beta
Text
[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A, the same type B is each excavationr, and Category C is an air conditioner.
1. The Defendants jointly committed the crimes of Defendant A and Defendant B: (a) on September 9, 2016, from around 07:0 to around 09:30, the forests where the victims K located in the Gangnam-gunJ are collectively persons; (b) on the one hand, at least 30 persons out of the forests, using fluenite fluenite fluenites and at least 30 persons, and the fluencies owned by the victims who are not aware of the market price; and (c) on the other hand, on the other hand, after removing the sum of 1,60,000 won in the Dongjak-gu 2 market price, the Defendants moved to the car owned by Defendant B and set up in advance waiting.
Accordingly, the Defendants, together, stolen the victim's property and stolen the product from the forest.
2. Joint crimes committed by Defendant A and Defendant C
A. On June 4, 2017, the Defendants: (a) in the forest described in paragraph (1) around 1, 2017, she cut at least 30 m30 m30 m3 in the forest, using glue glue (each length, 24 mm) and glue at least 30 m30 m30 m in the forest; (b) glue glue car in which the market price is unknown; and (c) glue at least 80,000 m in the motion monitoring glue car using glue ( length, 24 m) and carried it in the MU car owned by Defendant A, waiting in advance.
Accordingly, the Defendants, together, stolen the victim's property and stolen the product from the forest.
B. From around 06:30 to 09:00 on August 23, 2017, the Defendants: (a) removed from the forests listed in paragraph (1) the sum of KRW 8,550,000 for the total market value of KRW 1,60,000 for the motion surveillance camera two market value using flamer (24cm in length) from around 06:30 to around 09:00; (b) used the flamer’s 42 and the 29 market value of the Defendant’s flamer owned by the victim using the flamer’s blamer’s 29th flab, respectively, and carried them into the MA car owned by the Defendant and waiting in advance.
As a result, the Defendants jointly stolen the victim's property.