1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a limited partnership company running taxi transport business, and Defendant A is a taxi driver who drives C-si owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant vehicle”), and Defendant B is the wife of Defendant A.

The Plaintiff entered into a mutual aid agreement on the instant vehicle with the National taxi mutual aid association (hereinafter “instant mutual aid association”).

(hereinafter “instant mutual aid contract”). (b)

On October 6, 2012, Defendant A asked Defendant B to drive the instant vehicle from Defendant B’s house to his house on the ground that Defendant B was under the influence of alcohol.

Accordingly, on October 6, 2012, Defendant A was on board the instant vehicle, driving the instant vehicle on the front of the Eeetype D, which was operated from the jurisdiction of the Seoul Hospital at Yacheon-si on October 21, 2012 to the right-hand off of the straight distance from the front of the Eetype, and the left-hand turn on the right-hand turn-hand turn-hand from the etyped off distance from the etyped off of the empha distance to the jurisdiction of the Seoul Hospital of Mancheon-gu.

(hereinafter “instant traffic accident”). F has suffered serious injury due to the instant traffic accident.

C. On October 22, 2012 and November 20, 2012, the instant mutual aid association paid a total of KRW 268,360,000 in the name of medical expenses and agreement to the victim F of the instant traffic accident.

The instant mutual aid agreement differs depending on the amount of the mutual aid premium to be paid each year by the mutual aid contractor according to the number of traffic accidents involving vehicles subscribed to the mutual aid agreement. However, due to the mutual aid agreement’s amount of KRW 268,360,000 paid by the mutual aid association to F due to the instant traffic accident, the Plaintiff’s contribution to be paid from 2013 to 2015 pursuant to the mutual aid agreement of this case was increased.

A contribution paid by the Plaintiff in 2013.