1. The Defendants are to the Plaintiff.

A. A. The buildings listed in the attached list are as listed in attached Form 1. 1.

A. The building of this case was newly constructed. Around March 1, 1969, H jointly succeeded at the ratio of 3/9, 3/9, 2/9 of the wife, Defendant E, Defendant C, and J, each of whom was 2/6, and Defendant D, each of whom was 2/6, and 1/6 of the husband, as the J died on February 9, 1975, he jointly succeeded at the ratio of 1/6 of the husband, and Defendant E, and Defendant F, each of whom was 2/6, and 1/6 of the husband, due to the death of Korea around October 29, 1986. As H jointly succeeded at the ratio of 3/7, Defendant E, and Defendant F, each of whom were son’s dependants, and 2/7 of the deceased on February 6, 2003, the deceased on February 6, 2003, Defendant D’s heir and heir of each of Defendant E-D and each of the deceased on March 3/D.

Ultimately, the instant building is currently owned by Defendant B, Defendant C, each 126/378 (the portion inherited due to the death of each H 2/9 I), and Defendant D’s 54/378 (the portion inherited due to the death of 2/99*2/63/71/3 of that due to the death of the J 2/99*2/63/7), Defendant E, and Defendant F shared the share of 36/378 (the share of inherited property due to the death of 2/92/62/7) in inheritance due to the death of each J 36/378 (the share of inherited property due to the death of 2/91/62/62/3).

- Meanwhile, the rent market price for the instant land from 2008 to 2015 is as stated in the annexed sheet of the assessment of rent.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, evidence A1 to 5, result of appraisal of rent, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. According to the above facts, the Defendants occupied the instant land by sharing the instant building on the instant land owned by the Plaintiff without title in their respective shares. As such, the Defendants removed the instant building within the scope of their respective shares, and (2) returned unjust enrichment in relation to the amount equivalent to the rent for the instant land. As such, from November 19, 2010 to August 18, 2015, the date on which the Plaintiff acquired the ownership of the instant land.