Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Criminal facts

On June 7, 2014, around 05:10 on June 7, 2014, the Defendant was going to go to the direction of the national bank by boarding the taxi in the sports E-si of the Do (the age of 56) operated by the victim promotion transportation company, and going to go to the direction of the national bank. However, D refused to go to “the way is not allowed to pass one-way.” However, the Defendant got off the above taxi from the above taxi to the right side of the taxi, cut off by hand, destroyed the above taxi owned by the victim so that it can go to the non-repair of the repair cost.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing taxi destruction and damage;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant has been punished several times for the same kind of crime, and even if the defendant had been punished for repeated crimes and suspended execution period, it appears that the defendant committed the crime in this case without being aware of it, and even if he had been employed for a repeated crime and suspended execution period, it appears that the defendant was not aware of the fact that he committed the crime in this case without being aware of it, or that he was not subject to punishment for the defendant, and that he would be able to faithfully perform his duty of military service as social work personnel in the future as he did not go against the wrong recognition of it, and that the defendant's family members want to be able to take a preference, and that the defendant's family members also have evaluated the defendant's efforts to repent, and other favorable circumstances such as the defendant's age (23 years of age), character and behavior, environment, family relationship, criminal record, etc., it is reasonable to give the defendant more and more mature opportunity as a mature society by selecting the defendant only once.

Public Prosecution Rejection Parts

1. The summary of the facts charged is among the facts charged in this case.