1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff, while serving as a marina with female employees in the entertainment drinking house of the trade entertainment drinking club called “C”, was obligated to pay KRW 200 million to the proprietor of C.

D Around July 2010, while running an entertainment tavern (the name of the representative of business registration is H) with the trade name “G” in Gangnam-gu Seoul as E and Dong business, D proposed that the Plaintiff work in G, and the Plaintiff accepted it.

D repaid the Plaintiff’s debt amounting to KRW 200 million on behalf of the business owner of C.

The Plaintiff, as seen above, worked as a marina in G from July 2010, and around May 201, the Plaintiff transferred the said entertainment tavern (hereinafter referred to as “K”) operated by I Co., Ltd. (the Defendant of the representative director) to the entertainment tavern (hereinafter referred to as “K”) in Gangnam-gu Seoul.

From April 1, 2011 to May 12, 2011, the Defendant repaid the Plaintiff’s debt of KRW 200 million to D.

On May 13, 2011, in order to secure the claim of KRW 200 million against the Plaintiff, the Defendant entered into a mortgage agreement on the attached property owned by the Plaintiff as to the attached property, and completed the registration of establishment of a mortgage over the maximum debt amount KRW 20 million in the future of the Defendant as the Seogu District Court Branch No. 62282, May 13, 201.

(2) We examine the following facts: (a) The Plaintiff’s ground for recognition was without dispute; (b) Gap’s evidence No. 1; (c) Eul’s evidence Nos. 1 through 6, and 8 (including virtual numbers); and (c) the Plaintiff’s claim for cancellation of the registration of creation of a mortgage prior to the overall purport of the pleadings. Thus, we examine the Plaintiff’s claim for cancellation of the registration of creation of

The Plaintiff’s assertion of the right to collateral security in this case is to secure the Plaintiff’s claim for the advance payment of KRW 200 million borne by G or K, and since the advance payment was received for the purpose of arranging commercial sex acts in G or K, the claim for advance payment is null and void in accordance with Article 103 of the Civil Act.

Provided, That evidence Nos. 3 and 5 shall be numbered.