beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendant, while promoting the purchase of the DNA telecom in Gyeongdong-gun C (hereinafter “the instant telecom”), reported Internet advertisements on October 7, 2017, and requested the Plaintiff to estimate the construction work of the instant telecom.
B. Accordingly, on October 27, 2017, the Plaintiff prepared a written estimate of KRW 933,677,417 of the construction amount and submitted it to the Defendant. However, he/she heard about his/her fluencies that the construction amount is too high, and then re-written a written estimate of KRW 869,303,423 of the construction amount on November 10, 2017 and submitted it to the Defendant.
C. On December 5, 2017, the Defendant, other than the Plaintiff, requested the Plaintiff to make an estimate to Co., Ltd. E, and received a written estimate for the amount of 697,180,000 construction cost, and requested F to make an estimate, and received a written estimate for the amount of 773,245,000 construction cost on November 1, 2017.
However, the remodeling work did not run on the wind that the Defendant did not purchase the instant telecom.
E. Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Defendant on charges of interference with the business, but the Daegu District Prosecutors’ Office rendered a disposition against the Defendant on May 31, 2018 that the Defendant was not suspected of having been subject to lack of evidence.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entries in Gap evidence 4, 5, 7, and 8, images, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. Although the Plaintiff’s assertion decided to place an order for remodeling construction of the instant telecom, the Defendant did not place an order for remodeling construction without purchasing the instant telecom, inasmuch as the Defendant did not place an order for remodeling construction without purchasing the instant telecom, the Defendant is obligated to compensate the Plaintiff for the total amount of KRW 31,740,000,000, when it was incurred by the Plaintiff.
B. We examine the judgment, as seen earlier, that the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to estimate the remodeling project of the instant Moel, but, in addition, the Defendant ordered the Plaintiff to undertake the remodeling project of the instant Moel.
(b).