The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a boomer and boomer.

On July 19, 2014, around 15:00, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent in advance accidents that may not fall or fall away from the invasion, when the Defendant provided life to patients who are frightened by their protectors at the fourth bath of the building B in Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, and senior citizens.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and went to the her guardian with the victim who is unable to walk or work without his/her guardian’s her care, and went to the her guardian while finishing the her life with the victim who was unable to move to the her her, but without his/her guardian’s care, the Defendant left the victim with his/her her arms in the middle of the her life with his/her her bry with his/her her her bry, thereby allowing the victim to be deprived of her her bry with his/her her bry, making the victim her bry, and her bry with his/her brys,

As a result, the Defendant suffered by negligence the injury of the victim, such as 's acute trauma surgery,' which requires a medical treatment for about five weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the suspect;

1. Statement of each police statement of D and E;

1. A medical certificate;

1. A complaint;

1. Investigation report (field investigation) and investigation report (related to a violation of the duty of care of the accused);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Articles 268 (Selection of Punishment of Fines)

1. Penalty fine of 2,00,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day converted);

1. Although the Defendant’s reason for sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Pronouncement of Sentence does not reach an agreement with the victim’s family members, in light of the fact that the instant accident occurred in the situation where the victim’s guardian was unable to hand over the victim because the Defendant’s guardian did not appear immediately even after the Defendant completed his/her three-years work.