The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the purport of the grounds for appeal: (a) the confession and reflect of the Defendant; (b) the Defendant sent out by the police officer due to the wife’s report while disputing the issue of the wife’s deposit and the deposit deposit; (c) the Defendant committed the instant crime contingently; and (d) the Defendant agreed with the victimized police officer G (hereinafter “victim”) at the lower court, the sentence (six months of imprisonment) sentenced by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the defendant, the crime of this case is committed by two persons, including the police officers belonging to the Kimbu Police Station, who were called out after being reported by their wife while disputing the defendant in his/her place of residence, to enter the above place of residence to verify the details of report, etc., and the head of the police station: (a) assaulting the police officers who suffered damage by using his/her hair; (b) unbrupting the body of the police officers who suffered damage by hand; and (c) assaulting the damaged police officers by using his/her force; and (d) four ties of the two preceding directions of his/her left movement while provoking, and interfere with the legitimate performance of official duties by the damaged police officers; and (c) in order to establish the State’s legal order and eradicate public peace, the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties requires strict punishment; and (d) the defendant was punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six years, including imprisonment with prison labor, and imprisonment with prison labor for six years; and (e) the court below has already committed damage to the victim police officers.