logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 해남지원 2018.07.05 2018고단82
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 26, 2018, the Defendant driven the alcohol by the Defendant, such as drinking alcohol, smelling the Defendant’s face, following the arrival at the site of four police officers other than G G G G G G G, etc. from the F District, who called out, after receiving a report that the Defendant would not stop the vehicle after stopping at the site, on the 100 Dondo Don-Eup, south-do Dondo 100, Namnam-do Dondo 100, south-do Dondo-Eup, and the Defendant was driving the alcohol by drinking the alcohol.

There is a considerable reason to suspect that G has requested the defendant to respond to approximately 15 minutes of alcohol consumption measurement on four occasions, but he/she did not comply with it without good cause.

2. On January 26, 2018, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) on and around 22:15, 2018, driving a motor vehicle with an Esch Rexroth driver’s license within approximately 100 meters from the front day of the Nlfin-si in the Southern-gun, Nlin-do to the front day of the front day of the Nlfin-si located in the same Gunndo-Eup to the front day of the water in the same Gunndo-Eup.

3. On January 26, 2018, the Defendant insultd the victim’s slopeJ (hereinafter referred to as “victim”) with the victim’s son, i.e., e., the Defendant, within the F District Office located in Dondo Eup, Dondo-Eup, Dondo-Eup, and the Defendant’s Dondo-I.

”, “ 저 씨 발 놈 새 꺄!”, “ 호로 새끼야! “라고 큰소리로 말하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

4. The Defendant of intimidation shall, at the time and place set out in paragraph 3, be sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and shall be discarded to death of the victimJ.

“The victim was threatened” and the victim was threatened.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to J and I;

1. Making a report on the circumstances of the driver involved in driving and inquiring about the results of crackdown on drinking;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the ledger of driver's licenses;

1. Relevant Article 1482-2(1)2, Article 44(2) of the Road Traffic Act (a point of refusing to measure drinking), Article 152 Subparag. 1, and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act (a non-licensed driving) concerning facts constituting an offense;

arrow