1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff falling under the order to revoke below shall be revoked.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The lapse of the preceding case between the Plaintiff and the relevant students 1) The Plaintiff is a student who was enrolled in the second and second grade of D secondary school with E, G, and H as of 2015, and F is a student who was enrolled in the second and fifth grade of D secondary school (hereinafter “E, G, H, and F”).

(2) On November 11, 2015, the Autonomous Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence in D Middle Schools (hereinafter “instant autonomous committee”) held a meeting on November 11, 2015, and recognized the case that the Plaintiff was going to a private teaching institute, such as E, but the Plaintiff did not attend a private teaching institute, and requested the Defendant to take measures against the Plaintiff, regarding the case that the relevant student committed verbal violence against the Plaintiff or participated in the Plaintiff collectively (hereinafter “prior case”). On November 16, 2015, the Defendant issued a disposition against the relevant students on the following: (a) the Plaintiff’s written apology against the Plaintiff; (b) the contact with the victimized student and the reported or accused student; (c) the prohibition of retaliation and retaliation against intimidation; and (d) the replacement of class.

3) However, on January 13, 2016, an administrative appeals commission at the office of education in the Gyeongnam-do constitutes a common conflict among female students and the Plaintiff. The Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against Violence in Schools (hereinafter “School Violence Prevention Act”) provides that the relevant student’s verbal violence against the Plaintiff or bullying against the Plaintiff, etc.

(B) The Defendant revoked all dispositions made against the relevant students to the effect that it is difficult to deem that the “school violence” as prescribed in Article 2 was exercised. B) The Plaintiff’s mother B and E reported the occurrence of school violence to the Defendant on December 8, 2015, respectively, on which the Plaintiff’s mother B and E reported the occurrence of school violence to the Defendant on the same day. B reported to the effect that the Plaintiff was taking the Plaintiff’s birth at school on the same day, and the father reported to the effect that the Plaintiff was taking the Plaintiff’s birth

2. On December 15, 2015, G’s mother reported the occurrence of school violence to the Defendant, and the Plaintiff and B reported the occurrence of school violence to another student in relation to the preceding case.