A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

An applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

[2016 Highest 1100] The Defendant, around October 22, 2012, entered the victim F in the (State) E Creative Headquarters Office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, for several years, a mobile analysis tool development project related to the mobile siren at the Supreme Prosecutors' Office.

At present, in order to make proposals to the Supreme Prosecutors' Office project up to 380 million won, the Korean Supreme Prosecutors' Office submitted a business plan to the representative director (ju).

On October 23, 2012, the Supreme Prosecutors' Office had well known whether it is possible to receive five Nopt North Korea units as it is necessary to proceed with the business of the Supreme Prosecutors' Office on October 23, 2012, and causes five Nopt North Korea units to be supplied.

The Supreme Prosecutors' Office made a false statement to the Supreme Prosecutors' Office that "if public institutions deliver the price, it shall be immediately approved."

However, even if the Nowon-do was supplied, it was supplied to the Supreme Prosecutors' Office, or there was no intention or ability to pay the price to the victim.

On October 24, 2012, the Defendant was supplied five (5) Nompt North Korea worth KRW 5720,000,000 from the damaged party to December 20, 2012, and received six (25,225,30,000 from the time on which the Defendant was supplied with five (5) Nompt North Korea as indicated in the list of crimes in attached Form.

[2016 Highest 1404]

1. On April 4, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the victim H office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the victim H office, the representative director of the victim company, the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office, to supply five Nopt North Korea to the digital investigation unit of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office.

The phrase “the difference between the two North Koreas to be used for the work was false.”

However, the defendant did not implement the supply contract, etc. in relation to the business of the victim company, and it was thought that he would receive and dispose of Nowon-gu as necessary for the business.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received from the victim, a total of KRW 9,150,000,000,000,000 won, including five delel North Korea from the market price of KRW 1,430,000,000,000,000 won, from the victim.

2...