Defendant

A, B, and C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,00,000, and Defendant D and E shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The defendants are the defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants A, B, C, and D, together from March 28, 2020 to December 22:304, 202, together with 51 estest 10 estest estest estest estest estest estest estest, by acquiring points according to the rules and regulations using the satis in the same satis, 2 persons did not participate in the estest estest est est estest est est estest est est estest est est est. Defendant A, B, C, and D, together with 10 won per 10 won per estest 500 won by giving the tension to the tension.

2. Defendant E, at the time, at the time, and place specified in paragraph (1) above, aided and abetting the act of gambling by providing the said place and scambling, etc. in order to assist the gambling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of each of the Defendants’ respective statutory statements and photographs to the seizure list

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

A. Defendant A, B, C, and D: Article 246(1) of the Criminal Act

B. Defendant E: Articles 246(1) and 32 of the Criminal Act

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act for forfeiture;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the amount of fine imposed by the summary order on the grounds of sentencing on the grounds of the order of provisional payment shall not be deemed excessive to be determined by comprehensively taking into account all the conditions of sentencing, including the details and amount of the commission of gambling, the records of punishment for the same kind of crime, the motive and background of the crime of this case, the circumstances before and after the crime of this case, and the balance of sentencing with similar cases. Since there is no change of circumstances that may be considered in the sentencing after the notification of the summary order