Text
1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.
The defendants jointly do so to the plaintiff and 98,054,969 won and 68.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the case where the part of “the scope of liability for damages of April 1, 199” as stated below, thereby citing the first instance judgment in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
“4. Scope of the liability for damages (based on recognition), unsatisfyed evidence 9, 13, 15, 16, 20, 26, 29, Eul evidence 3, and Eul evidence 1 through 3 (including serial numbers, if any); hereinafter the same shall apply) of the aforementioned evidence
In principle, the respective period of time for calculating the damages shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 36.64 shall be discarded. The current price calculated at the time of an accident shall be in accordance with the one-time method that deducts intermediary interest at the rate of 5/12% per month. Moreover, it shall be excluded that the parties do not separately express their respective arguments. (a) Personal information / [basic matters] case number / 2018Na42047 damages (i.e., damages) / the Type A’s gender injury (i.e., 2018 or 42047), five years and five months of age per accident, and 36.64 days of the date of the occurrence of an accident, 2016-04-12, and the remaining working age at the time of the accident / 602-12, 2031-10-29-292, the Plaintiff may be deemed to be the average working age of the /3600,0,00,00,00.
Supreme Court Decision 200Da59920 Decided March 9, 2001, etc.