Text
All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.
Reasons
1. The Defendant, who was aware of the facts charged, was aware of the victim B, and the price of the house the victim purchased in the form of the public order market was reduced before the towing, and there was a complaint.
On January 4, 2019, at around 20:0, the Defendant: (a) performed a scambre problem in a restaurant operated by the victim in Seo-gu Incheon City, Incheon; (b) called “the victim who was removed from 2 million won,” and publicly insulting the victim on the job where two customers and one restaurant employee are located.”
B. On January 16, 2019, around 00:30 on January 16, 2019, the Defendant made a public insult of the victim at a place where two customers are made, by saying, without any reason, that “the victim is a bad one, bad one, bad one, or bad one.”
2. Determination
(a) Matters subject to prosecution upon complaint: Articles 311 and 312 (1) of the Criminal Act;
B. On April 25, 2019, the victim, after the prosecution of this case, expressed his/her intention not to punish the Defendant.
(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act;