The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable in its summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. The fact that the amount of damage to the fraudulent crime is only 130,000 won is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case during the period of probation, agreed with the victims or did not make efforts for the repayment of damage, the intention to comply with the legal order such as receiving disciplinary measures twice in violation of acceptance order during the period of suspended confinement seems to be imminent. On February 13, 2019, the crime of fraud occurred again on March 21, 2019 when he was arrested and investigated as a flagrant offender on the ground of the fraudulent act on February 13, 2019. On March 21, 2019, the police officer called on March 21, 2019 that he can be arrested as a flagrant offender and urged the payment of the price to be made by urging the police officer who was dispatched at the time of committing the fraudulent act to do so, and the fact that there is no money was no money to be identified, and the situation after committing the crime is not very good.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and the environment, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable and unreasonable. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.