The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for two years, confiscation) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the judgment of the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect them. Although the sentence of the first instance falls within the reasonable scope of discretion, it is desirable to reverse the judgment of the first instance court on the sole ground that it is somewhat different from the opinion of the appellate court, and to refrain from imposing a sentence that does not differ

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). The following are the circumstances favorable to the Defendant: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is recognized as a substitute for his/her own mistake; (b) the degree of injury to the victims is not much serious; and (c) the Defendant’s health is not good.

Meanwhile, in light of the motive and method of the crime, the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., there is no doubt that the crime of this case has been repeatedly committed despite the fact that the crime was punished several times for the same kind of crime and the same type of crime, and accordingly, it appears that it is necessary to isolate the crime for a considerable period from society, and that there is no agreement with the victims who are family members or the victims who did not receive a letter of suspicion despite being given a considerable opportunity for agreement, etc.

Therefore, the court below determined the punishment within a reasonable scope by fully taking into account all the circumstances regarding the sentencing of the defendant, and there is no circumstance that can be newly considered in the trial.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the various circumstances, such as the motive and means of the crime and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentencing of the court below cannot be deemed to be so excessive that the sentencing of the court below goes beyond the reasonable scope of discretion.

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the appeal is without merit.