1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 452,438 against the Plaintiff and its related thereto, from November 1, 2014 to September 28, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Plaintiff’s vehicle B (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”). The Defendant is the owner and the driver of the vehicle C (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”).

B. Around 09:30 on October 21, 2014, the Plaintiff’s vehicle entered the intersection from the direction of the Defendant’s vehicle, which entered the intersection at the local administration Donnam-Eup, was caused by an accident where the part on the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle, such as the shock gate on the left side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and the shock string of the front side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

C. By October 31, 2014, the Plaintiff paid a total of KRW 646,340 for the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle to the repair business entity.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The main point of the parties' assertion is that the plaintiff's vehicle entered the intersection but the accident of this case occurred due to the unilateral negligence of the defendant's vehicle that entered the intersection as soon as possible, the defendant is obligated to pay all the repair cost of the plaintiff's vehicle 646,340 won and damages for delay. Accordingly, the defendant asserts that since the defendant's vehicle entered the intersection first, the negligence of the plaintiff's vehicle is greater since it entered the intersection.

나. 판단 위 증거들에 의해 알 수 있는 이 사건 사고가 발생한 교차로의 현황, 당시 원고 차량과 피고 차량의 진행 방향, 이 사건 사고 당시 원고 차량의 속도에 비해 피고 차량의 교차로 진입 속도가 훨씬 빨랐던 것으로 보이는 점 등을 종합하여 보면, 피고 차량에 이 사건 사고의 발생 또는 손해의 확대에 상당한 과실이 있다고 할 것이고, 한편 앞서 본 사정들을 감안하면 원고 차량 대 피고 차량의 과실 비율을 30 : 70으로 봄이 상당하다.

Therefore, the defendant's share of the defendant's vehicle out of 646,340 won of the insurance money paid by the plaintiff to the plaintiff.