Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and three months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of six months.

provided that this ruling has become final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and Defendant B conspired with E, F, G to receive money in a way that, even though there was no idea that they did not actually engage in “refiscing” in the name of an illegal foreign exchange trader, they knew others that “I would give 2% of the fee immediately if I would lend money to make a refiscing, that is, I would give the money to be refisced,” and if I would actually refund money and would not refund money after the victims received money from the victims.

Defendant

A played an overall supervisory role, such as checking the subject of the crime, ordering accomplices to act and purchasing spophones to use in committing the crime, and E explains the victim in China as “H,” while explaining the victim in China as “H, and designating a person to pay and receive money from the victim in China, Defendant B is carrying out one-time “I” and G is carrying out one-time “J”, and Defendant B is going to receive money from the victim, and F is willing to play a role in gathering money from the victim as “K” while doing so several occasions on the part of the victim.

1. The Defendants, E, and F, who attempted to commit fraud, shall take money from the victim D and L, who are the aftermath of Defendant A, to take the above means. Defendant A, around August 2012, stated that “I may receive 2% of the fee, but I have to take up the money once again, and I have to take up the money back together with B in China, so I have to directly look at China.” The victim D and L call from E in China, while the victim L was called to E, E would be able to receive a large amount of fee if I have provided money when I make a refund.

However, there is a difference between the team giving money and the team receiving money, and the other person receives.