The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The instant crime is a serious crime that undermines the function of the State by nullifyinging the legitimate exercise of public authority, and thus requires strict measures to eradicate the light of public authority, and the Defendant committed the instant crime even though there was a past record of criminal punishment, including having been sentenced to suspended sentence of imprisonment for the same kind of crime in the past, and even if so, did not have been used by the victimized Police Officers up to now, taking into account the following circumstances: the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, and various sentencing conditions as shown in the instant records and arguments, such as the motive for the instant crime, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.