1. The Defendant’s KRW 300,000,000 as well as 20% per annum from April 16, 2015 to September 30, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff set KRW 200,000,000 as interest rate of 12% per annum on July 3, 2013, and set KRW 100,000 on October 25, 2013 as interest rate of 26, and 24% per annum (24% per annum) on December 26, 2013. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff the above loan amount of KRW 300,000,000 (i.e., the above loan amount of KRW 100,000,000,000, and 200,000,000 per annum on April 16, 2015, which is a copy of the complaint of this case.

2. The defendant's defense against the loan of this case is defense that C, the actual borrower of the loan of this case, was discharged from the debt of this case with the approval of the plaintiff around October 2014.

In light of the following facts and circumstances, it is difficult to believe that the testimony of the witness C is consistent with the above defendant's defense, and it is difficult to recognize that C has taken over the debt of this case merely on the basis of the statement of evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 8, and the whole purport of the pleading in consideration of the following facts and circumstances, it is difficult to believe that the testimony of the witness C is consistent with the above defendant's defense, and it is difficult to recognize that C has taken over the debt of this case as the discharge of the debt of this case, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise, since the statement of evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4 through 7 is not sufficient to acknowledge that C has taken over the debt of this case.

1. The defendant and C.