logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2018.08.29 2018나10265
소유권이전등기등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's reasoning for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance is that of "2. Judgment".

In addition to the addition of the following matters, it is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The part added (4) appears to have been agreed upon by the Plaintiff and the Defendant as to the subject matter of sale, purchase price, and date of conclusion of a contract through C and D, but it appears that there was no reference as to the intermediate payment, the amount of the balance, the payment method and time of payment, the delivery time of the subject matter of sale, etc. In such a situation, the Defendant clearly stated that there was no intention to enter into a sales contract without commencing discussions on the important matters of the sales contract as above.

Therefore, it cannot be deemed that there was an agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on the essential matters of the sales contract or on the criteria and methods that can be specified in detail in the future.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow