Text
1. The plaintiff's lawsuit against the defendant E shall be dismissed.
2. The plaintiff's claim against defendant C and D.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On February 7, 2003, the A-B Reconstruction Promotion Committee (hereinafter “A-B Promotion Committee”) was organized to remove existing A-B apartment (A is 1,320 households, and B is 1,400 households) located on the ground of the same Gu and 11 lots of land outside the same Gu, and to reconstruct (hereinafter “instant reconstruction”) the apartment on the ground, and the Defendant E was elected as the chairperson of the A-B Promotion Committee for A-B Promotion.
(2) As a result of the discussion about the participation of the residents of A apartment, the promotion team of A/B selected the consulting company and decided to induce the participation of the residents of A apartment, and received the consulting service proposal from the consulting company around February 25, 2003. The four companies, including Defendant D (hereinafter “Defendant D”) and Defendant C Co., Ltd (hereinafter “Defendant C”), H (hereinafter “H”), and the project team comprised of the Dong E&C architect (hereinafter “H”) and the Dong E&C architect (hereinafter “H”) participated.
(3) On March 4, 2003, A/B selected 58 voting teams for the selection of consulting companies (51 persons A sectional owners and B sectional owners). On March 9, 2003, 2003, 48 voting teams were selected as priority negotiation partners through voting, and entered into a consulting service contract with D Survey Team on March 15, 2003. The service charges were set at KRW 12,500 per square meter per total floor area of the newly constructed building.
B. On February 28, 2003, A apartment residents constituted A-building promotion committee (hereinafter “A promotion committee”) in addition to A-B promotion committee at the apartment representative council, and on March 30, 2003, I elected A as the chairperson of A promotion committee.
(2) On April 17, 2003, the promotion level A shall be the first instance court.