1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff was appointed as a policeman on May 29, 2009, and was promoted to the Superintendent on April 1, 2013. From July 10, 2014, the police officer working at the Seoul Mine Police Station criminal and B Team.

On November 19, 2014, following the resolution of the disciplinary committee, the Defendant made a disposition of demotion against the Plaintiff on the grounds that the grounds for disciplinary action violates Articles 56 (Duty of Fidelity), 57 (Duty of Fidelity) and 63 (Duty of Maintenance of Dignity) of the State Public Officials Act.

(hereinafter “instant disciplinary action”). 【Grounds for Disciplinary Action】

1. The Plaintiff, while working for the investigation from October 13, 2014 to 09:0 to 21:00, left at will one hour, without reporting to the head of the department to which he/she belongs, and neglected to perform his/her duties, such as drinking alcohol to the extent that he/she was unable to associate with the reporter who became aware of in the course of coverage of “bomb investigation” from 20:00 to 20:0, while standing in company with the reporter who became aware of in the course

b. 2. On October 13, 2014, from around 20:00 to around 3, 2014, “D” contains a single-brupted mix between E of the team leader, F Social infrastructure G (n, 30 years of age), H Social Flag I (n, 26 years of age), H reporter J and K with the first-lane;

A. On October 14, 2014, around 00:00, moving the said “D”, a second place, to a “K” nearby the said “D, and 0:32 to 00:40, leaving the shoulder of G, standing up in the front, standing up in the front, making up the hand, etc., and continuing to enter a female toilet twice in accordance with G at around 00:52 to 00:53, while going into the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the latter, but was refused depending on G returning home at around 01:0;

B. After having returned home by G and J, the Plaintiff sought to attract G to “K” as the main point of E circumstances, I and three lanes “K”, while drinking alcoholic beverages. At around four lanes, G and J conducted physical contact, such as moving to “Mnonode” in front of the fourth parallel of four lanes, and attempted to use I, thereby having sexual intercourse between G and I.