Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 3.5 million won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On December 21, 2017, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced imprisonment for a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act at the Seoul Southern District Court on August 21, 201 and was sentenced to two years of suspended execution on December 29, 2017.

1. Defendant B and Defendant A’s person who has violated the Act on the Registration of Loan Business, etc. and the Protection of Financial Users must register with the Mayor/Do Governor having jurisdiction over the relevant place of business by the relevant place of business. Nevertheless, on April 2017, the Defendants introduced C to Defendant B, who wants to obtain a loan, and Defendant B granted KRW 1.6 million after deducting 20% of the prior interest and 20% from the loan to C, by introducing C, which was transferred to Defendant B as a security for the D Soft car owned by Defendant B, from around April 201 to the south-gu Incheon Metropolitan City.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to engage in the unregistered loan business.

2. Where a person who has acquired an automobile in violation of the Automobile Management Act by Defendant B and E intends to transfer it again to a third party, he/she shall file an application for registration of transfer of ownership of automobile

Nevertheless, Defendant B and E had the intent to dispose of the said so-called so-called ‘defababababababababababababababababababa, which the said C had received as security for the payment of the loan, with intent to collect the loan, and Defendant B transferred the said car and the documents related to the registration of the automobile, which had been held near the station of the said week around April 2017, to E, and E sold the said so-called so-called ‘defabababababababa' to Defendant B and E without transferring the ownership of the said car to Defendant B and E.

As a result, Defendant B and E conspireded to transfer an automobile without transferring ownership in their own name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Statement made to C;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of the original register of motor vehicle registration);

1. Previous Records: Case summary information;