1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the ancillary claims against Defendant B and C shall be modified as follows:

2. The plaintiff

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this part of the underlying facts is as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except as follows. Thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In the 3th 4th 5th 7th m2, “The land of Seosan-si E large E large 56m22th m2, Jan. 13, 2015 was combined with F large 76m2, Jun. 13, 2015,” “Yansan-gu Flux 76m2, Seosan-gu was combined with E large 56m2.

2. The first instance court's main claim dismissed the plaintiff's main claim, and since the plaintiff did not appeal against it, the main claim does not fall under the scope of the trial court's judgment.

3. Judgment on the conjunctive claim

A. Defendant B and C sold the instant real estate to the Plaintiff and again sold the instant real estate to the Defendant D even after receiving the purchase price. As such, Defendant B and C jointly concluded a sales contract for the instant real estate agreement with the Plaintiff in relation to the instant real estate purchase and sale price of KRW 184,99,80 ( KRW 100,000,000, KRW 75,110,000, KRW 110,000, KRW 4,029,800, KRW 5,000, KRW 860,000, KRW 60,000,000, KRW 2499,80,000, KRW 999,980,000, KRW 60,000, KRW 60,000, KRW 600,000, KRW 60,000, KRW 600,000, KRW 60,000 and KRW 20,00.