The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (the imprisonment of eight months, the suspension of the execution of two years, the community service order80 hours, and the lecture attendance order for sexual assault treatment 40 hours) against the Defendant on the summary of the Defendant’s appeal grounds is too unreasonable.

2. In the case of this case, where the body of the defendant's assault is close to the indecent act, the physical form of force or the degree of indecent act is hot;

It is difficult to see that the defendant is the first offender, and the defendant is the first offender and reflects the wrong in depth while committing the crime, and the fact that the court below agreed with the victim is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the crime of this case is an indecent act committed by the defendant against the victim on the street, and the crime of this case is not against the nature of the crime and the circumstances of the crime, but against the defendant, such as the mental impulse and the state of the body suffered by the victim. In addition, considering all the sentencing conditions of this case, including the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, family relationship, and the circumstances after the crime, the punishment of the court below is deemed to be within a reasonable and appropriate scope, and it is not unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.