Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant acquired the C resident registration certificate rapidly between C and C, and used it to open the cell phone without C's consent.

On January 31, 2013, the Defendant contacted F, who operates E located in the city of his own government, with the consent of women-friendly Gu, prepared an application for mobile phone entrance in the name of women-friendly Gu, and sent a copy of the above C’s identification card, and let F, who is unaware of such fact, prepare two copies of the mobile phone sales contract stating the subscriber’s “C”, resident registration number “G”, and the applicant’s “C” and submitted them to LGU.

As a result, the Defendant forged the cell phone sales contract in the name of C, which is a private document on the rights and obligations, and exercised it respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of police statement concerning C and F;

1. Application of a copy of each sales contract for a mobile phone, a copy of resident registration certificate, and personal information utilization agreement;

1. Articles 231, 34 (1), 31 (1) (a) of the Criminal Act of the relevant Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Articles 234, 231, 34 (1), and 31 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of uttering of falsified Investigation Documents);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment on account of a separate crime and is currently subject to a trial at the appellate court. However, the criminal facts of this case are merely forging and using two copies of a mobile phone sales contract in the name of a female-friendly woman who was dead. Although the defendant was guilty of committing the crime of this case due to the outside of a public prosecution instituted by a middle school, the defendant was dismissed due to a middle school and H, and the detailed contents of the crime were led by H.