1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On February 25, 2012, the Plaintiff asserted the cause of the Plaintiff’s claim that: (a) he received a transplant surgery from the Defendant on February 25, 2012; (b) there was a scarcity on the part of the maternal organ as soon as possible after the surgery; and (c) there was a arbitr infection; and (b) there was a low birth rate of the transplant of the transplanted hair; and (d) there was a low spreading rate of the transplant of the transplanted hair, and the transplant did not have the direction of transplant; and (e) the Defendant failed to perform the procedure, and thus, the Defendant is liable for tort due to medical malpractice

In addition, the Defendant’s failure to explain the risks, such as anticipated reflects prior to this case’s alcohol, thereby seeking damages for the reason that the Plaintiff’s right to self-determination was infringed as a patient.

2. Details and progress of the procedure for the plaintiff;

A. On February 25, 2012, the Plaintiff received a gromanal surgery at the hospital operated by the Defendant.

The above operation was recovered from the body of the body of the back and transplanted on the body of the back, and the defendant transplanted the 4,000 cap of the body of the back to the plaintiff in such a way as the above.

B. The Plaintiff had no special problems in the foregoing surgery, but to observe the past on February 28, 2013, the Plaintiff was under surveillance and drug prescription before the second transplant surgery, which was conducted on May 16, 2013.

C. After undergoing the secondary transplant surgery, the Plaintiff applied to the Defendant Hospital to observe the progress on May 24, 2014, and was given an injection and drug prescription due to the arbitritis symptoms.

Although the plaintiff complained of the coloring in the body of transplant after the transplant surgery, the plaintiff himself/herself expressed to the physical appraiser that the coloring has improved on the body body part of the transplant transplant, there is a scarcity due to coloring on the part of the transplant and the plaintiff himself/herself has also improved the coloring.

In the event of a transplant operation, such as the plaintiff, he/she has undergone a transplant operation, he/she shall do so, such as pain, side species, blood transfusion, transplant, infection, sacrife/humoculation, sacrife, and s