1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the modification or addition of the three parts among the judgment of the first instance as follows. As such, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Under the second sentence, “No. 16 of A” shall be added to “No. 14-1 to 6 of A” following the second sentence. (b) The fourth sentence “this court” shall be amended to the court of first instance.

(c) from "the defendant" to "no evidence exists" in heading 6 to 11 of the 4 side shall be written as follows:

It is recognized that the defendant was indicted on June 28, 2017 as an act of altering the part of the lease deposit stated in the lease contract as above and sentenced to imprisonment for one year and two months (No. 16 evidence, Daegu District Court 2015No. 5576). In addition, in relation to the defendant's assertion that the defendant lent a total of KRW 230,270,000 to the plaintiff, while the defendant filed a claim for a loan against the plaintiff under the Daegu District Court 2015No206533, Jun. 24, 2016, it is difficult to acknowledge the same fact on the ground that the defendant's claim was rejected on June 24, 2016 (Evidence No. 15). Ultimately, the evidence No. 1 cannot be admitted as evidence to acknowledge the defendant's claim as a document that altered the amount of the lease deposit stated in the defendant's report by the defendant. The defendant's remaining evidence No. 14 and evidence No. 14 of the defendant's. 14 and the defendant's statement are insufficient. 14.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.