The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. On April 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the Seocho-gu Seoul DD Building No. 1112 and 1309 Law Firm B office, the Defendant had an affiliated attorney C prepare a false complaint with respect to E and F using a computer for the purpose of having the E and its children receive criminal punishment.

The complaint "F, on March 28, 2013, sent a certificate of content to request the return of the claim against the complainant on the ground that the complainant was assigned by the Defendant E, the mother on March 28, 2013, and attached the notice of assignment of the claim, the contract for assignment of the claim, and the loan certificate.

(Evidence No. 2, No. 3, No. 4, the notice of transfer of the credit, and the contract of transfer of the credit for the extension of the credit). However, on August 18, 1999, the complainant did not borrow a gold of five million won against the defendant E, the defendant, and there is no fact that the defendant et al. written a loan certificate as asserted.

(See No. 5 of the No. 5 of the No. 5 of the No. 5 of the No. 5 of the No. 5 of the No. 5 of the No. 5 of the No. 11 of the No. 1 of the No. 1 of the No. 1 of the No. 1 of the No. 1 of the No. 1 of the No. 1 of the No. 1 of the No.

As seen above, the Defendant’s Nonparty’s act of forging the certificate No. 5 in order to claim the payment of unjust loans against the complainant, and exercising the above certificate by presenting it to the complainant by attaching it to the certificate of the content, which constitutes the forgery of the private document and the exercise of the above investigation document.

I have the honor to this effect.

As such, the defendant's act constitutes a violation of Articles 231 and 234 of the Criminal Act.

At present, the above-mentioned criminal act is continuing, and it is strict by thoroughly investigating the criminal act of the defendant.