beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000 and a fine of KRW 3,00,000, respectively, to Defendant B.
The Defendants respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B around 01:20 on May 31, 2016, Category B “E” outlined as “E” at the macro-si operated by oneself.
From the main point of view, the victim F(32 years of age)’s attitude of working as an employee did not appear in mind, and said, the victim said, “I am hing off, I am hing off to the house.” Since then, I am hinging the above hinging, Defendant B, who was contacted with the victim, was waiting for the victim before H in Sagu, which was in the place of promise, around 06:25 on the same day, was waiting for the victim, while waiting for the victim to talk with the victim.
Defendant
A, around that time, he found that Defendant B, who was aware of the nearest road of H, was arguing that he had a dispute with Defendant B due to telephone conversations with the victim, and he was able to hear the above facts from Defendant B.
Defendant
A found a victim who had arrived at a taxi in front of H in G at the si in the si, and after opening the head of the taxi in front of the si, the victim's face and head can be taken at a time by drinking, and the victim's face and head can be taken at a time by drinking with the victim's hand, and the defendant B who was in front of the si was also in front of the si and was faced with the victim's face and head.
As a result, the Defendants jointly put up two weeks of medical treatment to the victim and the part of the inner part of the victim in need of medical treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. The police statement concerning F;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reply to each photograph, appraisal commission and commission;
1. The Defendants: Article 2 (2) and (3) of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act
1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The Defendant A committed the instant crime during the period of the same repeated crime under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and all the Defendants were punished for the same kind of crime.