Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. On September 3, 2018, the Defendant read a title of “F sled to the interview sled in the same face of spawn,” which was posted to the victim G on the free bulletin board by a member having the clinic of “F,” and read a title of “Is the interview sled in the same face of spawn,” which is the basis of the basic part of the victim’s distribution and maintenance, on the part of the victim, the Defendant made a public insult of the victim by openly referring to the statement of “Iskn's spa in the face of spathn and spathn, which is the basic part of the basic part of the people’s distribution and maintenance, but did not know of the basis.”
2. Determination:
(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 311 of the Criminal Act;
(b) An offense subject to prosecution upon complaint: Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act.
C. On June 5, 2019, after the prosecution of this case was instituted, the victim’s revocation of complaint
(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act;