Defendant

The appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with labor for up to six months) of the original judgment is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances are as follows: (a) the Defendant’s mistake was divided in depth and reflected; and (b) the Defendant’s female is expected to be given birth.

However, the Defendant committed the instant special larceny during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime and did not recover damage therefrom. The first crime (special larceny) within the scope of the recommended sentences for the instant crime according to the sentencing guidelines established by the Sentencing Commission established by the Supreme Court. The first crime of larceny for general property: (a) type 2 of the thief for general property; (b) the area of recommendation; (c) the scope of recommended sentences for recommendations (10 to 2 years): Type 2 of the thief for general property; (d) the area of recommendation; (c) the area of recommendation; (d) the scope of recommended sentences for special larceny; (d) the scope of punishment (basic area); (e) the final sentencing following the aggravated punishment for multiple crimes: (e) the Defendant’s age, character and behavior; (e) environment; (e) the circumstances before and after the instant crime; and (e) the Defendant is deemed to have been sentenced to imprisonment for not less than 10 years but not more than 10 years; and (e) the court below’s final sentence of suspended sentence is deemed to be unfair.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.