Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim B (the 50-year old age) are married with the married couple and are currently pending a divorce lawsuit.

1. On June 25, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed assault by the victim either breaking the victim’s cell phone in the process of cutting off the Defendant’s cell phone from the defect; and (b) asking the Defendant’s arms.

2. On November 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) in front of Daejeon Pungdong C and D burial on the street around Daejeon, the Defendant: (b) inflicted an injury on the part of the victim, by pushing the victim so that the victim may not enter the said marina employee and the dispute with respect to the divorce lawsuit; (c) thereby cutting off the floor to the extent that the victim was pushed the victim so that the victim could not have any defect in the dispute with the said marina employee in connection with the divorce lawsuit; and (d) caused an injury to the victim, such as the dum

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. Photographs of the victim and on-site photographs;

1. A medical certificate of injury, or a copy of a photograph of the body part of the victim and a medical record;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the details of photographs on the cell phone taken by the victim on his/her arms;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), and the selection of each fine for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. As to the assault described in paragraph (1) of the facts charged, the Defendant did not assault the victim at the above time and place.

The argument is asserted.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence as seen earlier, namely, ① the victim was consistently and consistently abused from the Defendant at the time and place since the investigation agency.

(2) On June 28, 2016, the victim visited the hospital, which is three days after the date of the above case, in the copy of the medical record submitted by the victim as evidence (the 32 pages of the investigation record).