The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff, from around 2005, operated a mixed feed wholesale business with the trade name “C”. (2) On March 20, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was awarded a successful bid for the land plantation located in Jin-dong, Chungcheongnam-do; and (b) registered the business with the trade name “E” on September 1, 2015; (c) on March 2, 2016, the Plaintiff was awarded a successful bid for the fish plantation located in the near Sacheon-si, Seoul; and (d) registered the business with the trade name “G” around that time.

3) The Defendant’s husband’s husband H operated “J” under the name of K (H’s water) and “M” under the name of K (M), the sea-type fish farm located in L. B. The Plaintiff supplied feed to the instant fish farm from March 6, 2016 to July 13, 2016. According to the trading sheet (Evidence A2 and 10) prepared by the Plaintiff, the remainder of the feed related to the instant fish farm is KRW 108,950,000 in total, according to the Plaintiff’s trading sheet (Evidence A2 and 10). [Grounds for recognition], the Plaintiff did not dispute over the instant fish farm.

hereinafter the same shall apply.

each entry, the purport of the whole pleading

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The following facts or circumstances are acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the descriptions of evidence Nos. 2, 3, and 10 and the purport of the testimony and arguments of the witness of the first instance trial, i.e., the Plaintiff supplied feed to the instant aquaculture, i.e., the Plaintiff entered the date and time of the supply, the name, quantity, unit price, and price of the feed supplied in the instant aquaculture, and the method of stating “F”, “J”, “W”, and “L” in the instant aquaculture at the time. ②O (the Defendant’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s) as the person in charge of management of each of the instant plantation at around June 2014, and left from the Plaintiff’s business around June 2017.