A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who has been divorced between C (n, 50 years of age) and 2 years of age, and C is a son D (20 years of age) and his father, and C is a resident of the Fudio 301 of Busan Special Metropolitan City, the father of the Defendant, in the middle of 301.

1. Around 14:53 on January 13, 2017, the Defendant infringed upon a special residence: (a) on the ground that the Defendant did not request the victim C and D to leave several times; (b) destroyed a lock-out lock-out lock-out device, which is a dangerous object that he did not have to take part in several times; and (c) damaged the lock-out lock-out device, which is a dangerous object that he did not have to take part in the victim C and D; and (d) 5 copies of the door-up lock-out lock-out device installed in the ward, and intruded the victim D’s residence by carrying dangerous articles. Accordingly, the Defendant invadedd the victim’s residence.

2. A special intimidation Defendant was made to the victim C on the same date, time, and at the same place as the foregoing paragraph 1, for the same reason.

was known. Ghana

As “I am the shoulder,” which is a dangerous and dangerous object, you am the shoulder, and the victim D called “I Chewing, spher, and you see this phone. I am the shoulder as I am off.”

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and threatened victims, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each legal statement of the witness C and D;

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel asserted that there was no intention to intrude into his/her residence, and that there was no threat to the victims.

However, C and D consistently make a statement to the effect that they had been threateningd as if the Defendant was down at the time, and the content of the statement is specific, and even according to the Defendant’s statement, the victims were aware that they were living after opening the entrance and exit of the entrance and exit of the entrance, and the fact that they entered the entrance and exit of the children is recognized.