1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.

Basic Facts

The court's reasoning for this part is as follows: (a) No. 3 (2), (3) 2, and (4) 2 of the first instance court's judgment; (b) No. 3 and 1 of the second additional contracts; (c) "the above contracts" shall be deemed as "the above contracts (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the service contract in this case"); (d) "the first additional contract for design service" as "the modification of the business approval"; (b) "the second additional contract date" as "the second additional contract date" as "the 30 January 22, 207"; and (c) "the second additional contract date" as "the 50% of the commencement registration date" as "the 50% of the completion registration date"; and (d) "the date of commencement registration" as "the 60% of the above contract date" as "the 4000, 680, 280, 207 "the 680, 2087," and "the 4060," as "the 606.7.8.

Plaintiff’s assertion

According to the original contract for service costs, the Plaintiff agreed to receive 30% service costs at the time of the delivery of the execution design documents, and the Plaintiff submitted the final execution design documents to the Defendant on February 24, 2009.

In addition, according to the second additional contract, the Plaintiff agreed to receive a service price of 50% at the time of approval for sale, and the Plaintiff performed all design services as stipulated in the second additional contract. Accordingly, the Defendant obtained approval for sale from the Gam-si on January 14, 2009.

Finally, according to a minor modification additional contract, the Plaintiff was paid 50% upon receipt of minor modification and 50% upon completion of delivery of implementation drawings. The Plaintiff filed an application for modification of minor matters on August 5, 2008.