Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall lend any access medium while receiving, demanding or promising any consideration in using or managing the access medium;
Nevertheless, on June 2016, the Defendant sent a physical card to an account under the name of the Defendant and a mobile phone core chip from a person whose specific name was unknown, from a person whose name was not known, to whom the amount of taxes to be reduced or exempted is reduced or exempted.
In response to the proposal to the effect that “Kwikset service provider,” around that time, the head of the C-C-C-C-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-
2. No person who violates the telecommunications business Act shall intermediate a third party's communications or provide it for any third party's communications services provided by the telecommunications business operator;
Nevertheless, the Defendant provided telecommunications services provided by the telecommunications business operator through Kwikset service article to the above person through a cell phone number (E) at a place where it is difficult to know the specific location below Busan on the following day after receiving the proposal as mentioned in the above paragraph 1.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of the F and G respective Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 49(4)2, 6(3)2 (a point of lending access media) of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions, Articles 97 subparag. 7 and 30 (a point of providing telecommunications services) of the Telecommunications Business Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively, with labor;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;
1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is deemed to have been committed by the defendant in return for the promise of the defendant to receive the price, and to have lent the approaching media