1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.

1. The Plaintiff’s ground of appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance is not significantly different from the assertion in the court of first instance.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is examined as follows. Thus, it is accepted by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420

This Court shall be referred to as "court of the first instance" in the third 11 line of the judgment of the first instance.

The "general residential area" of 16 lines in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be added to "general residential area".

The 6th 10 lines of the judgment of the first instance shall be " June 12, 2016" with " June 12, 2017."

The "this case's judgment" in the 7th 11 line of the judgment of the first instance shall be applied to "the judgment of the first instance court".

2. The judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. Since it is obvious that "B litigation performer L and M" expressed by the defendant in the judgment of first instance is a clerical error in "B at the time of representative N", it is corrected ex officio.