The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

. As such, it is difficult to accept the Defendant’s assertion that the Defendant and B did not have any relationship with each other to the extent of holding a public contest regarding the preparation and distribution of the instant news report data, since they appear to have given information and assistance to both the Defendant and T.

② On May 29, 2014, around 12:01 and May 29, 2014, each currency between the Defendant and B contains the following conversations (Evidence Nos. 1208 through 1214 of the evidence record). On the ground that the instant traffic accident was intentionally committed, the son did not only passive answer to B’s proposal, but also actively respond to B’s preparation of false news report data, and the Defendant was urged by B to prepare news report data, while having B prepare the report data, the specific method of spreading the report data is indicated.

on May 29, 2014: B: E.S., No. 12:01 on May 29, 201: This is not a part of the private placement, but it is not intentionally, but ***noata.

on its starboard Doz. Doz.

피고인: 예, 괜찮죠.

B: Isra, online, or as soon as possible.

Defendant: Mascam, Mascam, B:

As the Defendant: (a) the AA has been reporting a lot of articles that are favorable to the Defendant as the reporter of the Z (see, e.g., evidence records 529 pages); and (b) according to the prosecutor’s statement in B by the prosecution, the Z was registered as a shareholder by the Defendant’s wife, and thus, the Z was well delivering an friendly article to the ordinary Defendant.

(Evidence Records 1611 pages, etc.). The call call No. 13:37 of May 29, 2014 shall be given beyond this test, and it shall not be any so doing, but it shall be any suspicion, think, or any other matter.

Defendant: Pastr sin ver B in the name of the office.

Defendant: It is necessary to see how related persons need to think at the election office B in the name of the election office.

The defendant is the freedom of thought. The defendant's response, which was known later.

i.e.;