logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.10 2015가합566670
구상금
Text

1. As to the real estate listed in the separate sheet, it was concluded on June 12, 2015 between B and the Defendant.

Reasons

1. On May 19, 201, B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”) entered into a credit guarantee agreement between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff with the principal of the guaranteed principal of KRW 340,00,00,000, guarantee period from May 19, 2011 to November 18, 2011 (final amendment to the guarantee period until November 13, 2015), and the credit guarantee agreement with D as a joint and several surety (hereinafter “the instant first credit guarantee agreement”). On May 19, 2011, the Plaintiff issued the guarantee counterpart’s credit guarantee agreement with the Bank (the branch), the guarantee counterpart of the Bank (the Bank), the guarantee amount of KRW 340,00,000,000, the guarantee period of KRW 340,000,000, and the guarantee period of KRW 400,000,000,000,00 guaranteed loan to B.

B concluded a credit guarantee agreement between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff on December 31, 2013 with the guaranteed principal of KRW 85,00,000 (final change to KRW 76,50,000) (final change to KRW 76,50,00), the guarantee period from December 31, 2013 to December 30, 2014 (final change to December 30, 2015), and the credit guarantee agreement with D as a joint and several surety (hereinafter “instant secondary credit guarantee agreement”). On December 31, 2013, the Plaintiff implemented the guarantee agreement with the other bank (the branch), the guarantee period of KRW 85,00,00, and the guarantee period of KRW 80,00,00, and the loan period of KRW 100,000,00,00,000, and the bank issued the guarantee agreement to B as a credit guarantee agreement.

B comply with the terms and conditions of a loan to the above banks, and at the same time, pursuant to the instant first and second credit guarantee agreement, the principal obligation shall be discharged to the Plaintiff on the date of repayment of the loan obligation. In the event that the Plaintiff performs the guaranteed obligation, the amount of the loan and the amount of the loan shall be additionally repaid according to the rate applied by the Plaintiff and the method of calculating the amount of the loan, and the legal procedure costs (repaid payment or substitute payment) incurred by the Plaintiff

B was decided to immediately lose the benefit of each loan in the event of a cause such as delinquency in the principal and interest or the current account, etc., but B was decided on March 2015.

arrow