logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2012.10.25 2012고합911
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On October 30, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 1.5 million won for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court on June 4, 201, a fine of 3 million won for the same crime at the same court on June 4, 2010, and a summary order of 2.5 million won for the same crime at the same court on December 14, 2010, and on April 21, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2.5 months for imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime, etc. at the same court on April 29, 201, and the decision became final and conclusive on April 29, 2011, and is currently under suspension of execution.

【Criminal Facts】

On August 25, 2012, at around 01:00, the Defendant driven a C-type car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 0.164% from the area of approximately 700 meters away from the dong-dong Mari-dong Mari-dong Mari-dong Mari-dong Mari-dong Mari-dong Mari-dong, Gwangju-dong Mari-dong Mari-dong.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on detection of a host driver;

1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation is three times a fine, which is advantageous to the reasons for sentencing, and the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence on April 201, even though he/she was sentenced to a suspended sentence, he/she again drives under the suspended sentence while driving under the suspended sentence. Since drinking water is considerably high, the defendant shall be sentenced to a suspended sentence, and the defendant's family relation and reflects the defendant, etc. shall be determined as per the disposition.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

arrow