A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] On July 13, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a period of six months by obstructing the performance of official duties at the Daegu District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 21st of the same month.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendant in violation of the Waste Management Act is a person who actually operates E and Stock Company F in Seongbuk-gun, Seongbuk-gun, and is engaged in interim disposal of construction wastes. G is a person in charge of the foregoing E’s bid for government-funded construction works, construction waste disposal in the workplace, general affairs, etc.

No person shall reclaim or incinerate wastes in any place other than a waste disposal facility permitted, approved, or reported.

Although industrial wastes, which are secondary wastes, such as waste synthetic resin generated in the process of interim disposal of construction wastes, are finally entrusted to an enterprise that treats wastes, the Defendant and G were willing to reclaim industrial wastes generated after treating construction wastes in the above E in order to reduce waste disposal costs.

In collusion with G, from August 2016 to December 2012, 2016, the Defendant laid off construction wastes accumulated in the construction waste storage site and the site of the said E from August 2016 to around 5 meters, and transported approximately 300 tons of industrial wastes to 60 tons of dump trucks, such as the waste synthetic resin generated after interim disposal of construction wastes, and buried them without permission by means of covering the said wastes with construction wastes.

2. The Defendant: (a) applied for a small and medium enterprise facility loan to a company bank as a person operating I in the Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun; and (b) normally, the amount of the loan is determined to be approximately 80% of the amount of the facility fund actually required; (c) thus, the Defendant was willing to receive the loan by falsely and additionally paying the remainder of 20% of the cost incurred in installing the machinery.