The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's imprisonment (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is against the defendant's wrong recognition, and there are circumstances that can be taken into account the circumstances such as that the defendant does not want the punishment of the defendant by agreement with the victim. However, in light of the content and circumstances of the crime of this case, the crime of this case is not less complicated, and the crime of this case is committed without being aware of the nature of the crime, the defendant was punished for the same crime, there is no special change in circumstances after the decision of the court below, and there is no special change in circumstances after the decision of the court below, and all the sentencing conditions in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character, character, occupation and environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, etc., even if considering the above circumstances favorable to the defendant, it is not recognized that the sentence of

Therefore, we cannot accept the defendant's above assertion.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the term "application of the law" in the judgment of the court below ex officio means that Article 258-2 of the Criminal Act applies to "Article 258-2 of the Criminal Act" as "Article 258-2 (1) of the Criminal Act" on 1.

.