Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a new CEFst vehicle.

On March 11, 2015, the Defendant driving the above vehicle at around 20:55, and driving the vehicle in the direction of Jindo in the direction of Jindo in the four-lane direction in the foreign exchange bank, depending on the five-lane distance near the D apartment distance in the front of the D apartment in the Gyeongsan-si, the Defendant came to turn to the left of D apartment direction.

Since there are three streets in which signal lights are installed, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the signals by reducing speed and by properly examining the right and the right of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to turn to the left, due to the negligence of violating the signal while driving the vehicle driving signal, received the front part of the F Carren vehicle driven by the victim E (year 40) driving in the direction of the Diplomatic Association in the direction of the Diplomatic Association.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, injury to the victim E, such as brain salvine which requires approximately 4 weeks of medical treatment, injury to the victim G (the victim 54 years of age) who is the passenger of the Karen vehicle for about 4 weeks of medical treatment, such as a 2nd cage thyle thyle, etc., and injury to the victim H (the victim Hah, 49 years of age) that requires approximately 14 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (the CCTV analysis, etc.);

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The accident of this case is caused by the defendant's violation of the notification of the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act.