logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.12.01 2017고단2887
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for nine months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 16, 2017, the Defendant was driving a Switzerland car from the 3rd members of the Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, to the same front road of the Gu, from the 3rd members of the Dong community service center to the same front road of the Gu, and the Defendant was parked in a police box to which the police officer affiliated with the police box, who discovered that the said car was driving over the central line with the rain distance, received a stop order on several occasions, but continued to stop without stopping.

F Lastren car, including a car, was stopped after shocking three motor vehicles.

After that, the Defendant, who gets off at the vehicle, was driven under the influence of alcohol, such as a large range of strings and a large number of strings, when she spaths, snife, snife, snife, and red.

there are reasonable grounds for suspecting

Along with the recognition of the foregoing police officer's demand for alcohol testing for about 15 minutes from around 05:50 to 06:05, the police officer did not comply with the demand without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the circumstances of driving at home and a report on the circumstances of the driver at home;

1. Report on the circumstances of a driver driving a drinking, notification of the results of crackdown on drinking driving, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report investigation;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44-2 (2) (Options of imprisonment);

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. All of the sentencing conditions indicated in the record, including the fact that the Defendant’s mistake is against the Defendant, and there is no criminal history exceeding the fine, compared to the mere drinking driving of the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act.

arrow